October 29, 2014

The Artist Still Known As Tom Conway



Tom Conway, the Bert Jansch of Norwich

https://soundcloud.com/gaz29-1/a-lynn-carol

Hear him doing the BJ version of 'In The Bleak Midwinter' too- probably on a Norwich pavement!

'Turnip' Townshend - the original EDP feature

 

pic reproduced courtesy of Poppyland publishing, Cromer, Norfolk 

A bit of a first for my blog readers here. My EDP Weekend feature on Turnip Townshend (25 October 2014) had to be adapted because of the lack of an available picture of the great man. It became ' Humble crop was a turnip for the history books' with turnip pics to match. You, dear blogger, can have both this revised feature and - feature first below - the original, focused more closely on dear old Charles. Plus the photos they might have used, given world enough and time...

Viscount (‘Turnip’) Charles Townshend of Raynham –a Farmer for All Seasons



Raynham Hall, Norfolk 


Ever wondered if you are in the wrong job?

If British foreign secretary Viscount Townshend of Raynham (1674-1738) – the Lord Lieutenant and effective political leader of Norfolk – hadn’t by 1729, he should have done. His credentials came from the Tony Hancock School of Careers Advice.

First, unlike Prime Minister Sir Robert Walpole of Houghton, his ‘noisy’ neighbour, Townshend was a famously poor public speaker. “Inelegant in his language’… ‘often perplexed in his arguments’ was the verdict of a peer who’d endured his longwinded speeches to the Upper Chamber since 1701.

Second –by his own admission to Walpole - he displayed “fits of spleen for which you have so often laughed at me” that made him “impatient of contradiction…impetuous… and overbearing.” Lord Hervey was less kind - “a slave to his passions…rash in his undertakings, violent in his proceedings, haughty in his carriage, brutal in his expression and cruel in his disposition.” Apoplexy would be the literal death of him in 1738.

Third, he made bad decisions and stuck to them.

Walpole needed a foreign policy that secured peace, prosperity and low taxes for the Hanoverian settlement, taking the wind out of Jacobite sails and restoring a fiscal confidence shattered by the South Sea Bubble scandal. Walpole tried to keep Townshend, then in Hanover with George I, on message: “My politics are to keep free from all engagements as long as we possibly can…I wish to God we may at least for a little time remain neutral and look on, if all the rest of Europe does the same thing.”

Instead, Townshend, more Hanoverian courtier than British statesman, schemed for aggressive war alliances with traditional enemies.

Fourth, he didn’t do subterfuge.  “If there be a place in the world where faction and intrigue are natural and in fashion, it is (the court of Hanover) which makes it no easy task for a stranger to behave himself inoffensively….”

Not the best choice of diplomat for one of the trickier moments of European history.

Townshend-and-Walpole were the Britain-leading West Norfolk dream team of 1722, double-heading a landslide Whig administration.  By 1727, to Townshend’s fury, this had become Walpole-and-Townshend and by 1729 was ending in a heated exchange about the way Walpole was managing the House of Commons. Walpole thundered “there is no man’s sincerity I doubt as much as your lordship’s!” whereupon Townshend – with his usual sincerity - seized his burly brother-in-law by the collar and both men went for their swords. Only the intervention of friends prevented an affray.

So ended a career that began so brightly in the reign of Queen Anne when Townshend was a member of the commission concocting the Act of Union with Scotland (1707). Highland Scotland supported the Stuart line of succession: James ‘III’ (The Pretender) Anne’s closest heir, but Catholic. England and Scotland had shared one monarch since 1603 but separate parliaments. Some Scots even favoured reverting to two kingdoms.

Townshend was promoted after the deal so presumably took credit for the Act’s buying off Presbyterian opposition to bishops and its creation of a free trade market between the countries. The Act gave Scotland access to Britain’s overseas colonies (Scotland’s traditional trade lines to France and Holland were in decline or war-ruin). The continuation of an independent Scottish legal system was conceded; Presbyterian rights guaranteed and reduced rates of taxation (because of Scottish poverty) added to the economic inducements – which included a degree of bribery. The Scottish Parliament was history – sold (to London-based Scottish aristocrats) ‘for English gold’ - until 1997.


Raynham Hall - pic reproduced courtesy of Poppyland publishing, Cromer, Norfolk 

But ‘Turnip’ Townshend was an undisputed world-leader in the scientific revolution of eighteenth century agriculture, to which he devoted his spare time, and ‘retirement’ (1730-1738.) It was a revolution led by rich landowners, farming large estates in Norfolk, especially ones underwritten by political influence and incomes outside farming. Like Coke of Holkham, Townshend inherited an estate totally unencumbered by debt and could afford to risk experiments, his successes then emulated by progressive but capital-inhibited yeomen farmers.

Position gave his experiments authority. Happily married to Walpole’s sister Dorothy and leading the family ‘firm’ of Townshend and Walpole as a recent Knight of the Garter, he began transforming Raynham Hall, lake, gardens and park at the height of his political power in 1724-5, His fashionable good taste, informed by long political sojourns in Holland, are reflected in the quiet elegance of the new entrance hall and grand saloon.

It was the age of growing literacy, ‘improvement’ culture and agricultural text books; of falling grain prices and a 13 per cent rise in the value of cattle; of greater incentives to improve pasture and find better winter feed. Scientific farming was incompatible with the primitive open field farming still being practised across half the country and with the small-scale yeomen farming that had replaced it in some areas.

Enclosures were back in vogue and this time not with the Elizabethan object of turning arable land into sheep pasture but of transforming communally cultivated, open fields –including the strips of Townshend’s smaller tenant units – into large compact farms on which the new and more scientific mixed farming could thrive. Waste (and common) land was enclosed, hedged and made effective.

England went Dutch. Dutch meadow grasses like clover and sainfoin and fodder crops were imported; Dutch immigrants grew turnips and carrots in small enclosed English fields; Dutch textbooks were translated into English; Norfolk farmers sent their sons to Holland to learn the new methods. Traditional East Anglian ties with Holland (windmills, drainage) all helped this.

But what really put the ‘turnip’ in Townshend and transformed the eighteenth century farm was using turnips – which still only made up 9% of the cropped land by 1720 - as a break crop between two cereal plantings.

Fed to livestock on the land, turnips caused it to be manured at the same time, doubly more productive than leaving it fallow. Along with clover and artificial grasses this rotation yielded nutritious pasture and a good hay crop. Stock could be improved in quality, increased in number and used to fertilise the soil all at the same time.

The ‘Norfolk Four Course Rotation’ - cereal-turnips-cereal-grasses - in a four year cycle was internationally celebrated. The Norfolk farmcart was the vanguard of the world.

Classical designs for farmyards were made; a ‘philosophy of improvement’ informed the placement of house in relation to farm buildings; the size of the barn; its number of doors, whether the facings of such utilities should be brick or otherwise.

The Norfolk system, according to Arthur Young in 1771, combined turnips, rotation, rationalised buildings, enclosure, the use of marl or clay to improve soil, the creation of large farms and the granting of long leases by landlords to change the farmer into an improving landowner. Turnip Townshend’s leases typically included conditions prescribing these. And he was doing it all decades before Arthur Young proclaimed it.

As early as 1704, Townshend was instructing his estate manager to oversee hedging, marling and selective breeding of the best stock – cattle as well as sheep – among his tenants and already engaged in ‘Enlightened’ farm-building and hedging.

By 1738 Townshend’s reputation as an improving landowner – with hedged fields “of a proper size for farms between 300 and 800 acres…square, well-disposed in relation to the home stall, the roads and the soil” - and his encouragement of turnip-growing -was proverbial throughout Europe. “He certainly practised the turnip culture on such an extent and with such success that he was copied by all his neighbours,” approved Young. By 1787, Norfolk was being described as ‘the cradle of the Agricultural Revolution.’

All this increased Townshend’s income by £900 per annum –a football transfer fee nowadays - and the total rental of the Raynham estate doubled between 1701 and 1756.

He transformed his Norfolk landscape from sheep-roamed heaths and commons into the hedged fields, compact farms and ‘classical’ architecture still recognisable today. Inspired by his Cambridge education, Grand Tour and a mind broadened by travel and government posts abroad, he rebuilt and re-landscaped the countryside.

Jonathon Swift could be contrasting the relative value of Townshend’s two careers when he writes in ‘Gulliver’s Travels’: “whoever can make two ears of corn or two blades of grass grow upon a spot of ground where only one grew before, would deserve better of mankind and do more essential service to his country than the whole race of politicians put together.”

For more see the English Model Farm (Windgatherer Press) and ‘Turnip’ Townshend: Statesman and Farmer (Poppyland Publishing) by Susanna Wade Martins. For Gareth’s EDP Weekend features and playscripts on Norfolk notables see www.garethcalway.co.uk/ blog.

And here's how that feature was published in EDP Weekend on Saturday Oct 25.


It was the crop that propelled Norfolk from a farming backwater to the envy of a nation - and brought huge wealth back to the county. GARETH CALWAY and TREVOR HEATON tell the story of the humble turnip, and the not-so-humble man who saw its golden potential...
Imagine if foreign secretary Philip Hammond were on a state visit to Germany, and while travelling around spotted an unusual crop growing in a field.

“Stop the car!” he tells his driver, and rushes out to find out more. Fired up with enthusiasm, he sprints back home to his Surrey constituency and persuades local farmers to grow this wonder plant. They do, and become very rich. And they all live happily ever after...

Sounds unlikely? But that’s just about what happened three centuries ago. And it was a Norfolk politician who spotted that there was ‘gold’ in them thar fields.

His name? Well, you’re probably ahead of us here: Viscount Townshend of Raynham (1674-1738)... better known to history as ‘Turnip’ Townshend.

But agriculture was only Townshend’s second career. As Lord Lieutenant and effective leader of Norfolk, he had - with his brother-in-law Sir Robert Walpole - been rising up the greasy pole of national politics for years, eventually reaching the giddy heights of foreign secretary.

It’s fair to say, though, that he was soon out-paced (and out-smarted) by his far-wilier in-law, who famously went on to be Britain’s first prime minister.

It didn’t help that as a politician he had four big drawbacks. First, unlike his ‘noisy’ neighbour Walpole of Houghton, Townshend was a famously poor public speaker. “Inelegant in his language”… “perplexed in his arguments” as one peer who’d endured his long-winded speeches to the Upper Chamber since 1701 put it.

Second by his own admission to Walpole - he displayed “fits of spleen for which you have so often laughed at me” that made him “impatient of contradiction…impetuous… and overbearing.” Or, in Lord Hervey’s judgement, “a slave to his passions…rash in his undertakings, violent in his proceedings, haughty in his carriage, brutal in his expression and cruel in his disposition.” In the end, apoplexy would be the literal death of him in 1738.

Third, he made bad decisions and stuck to them.
Walpole needed a foreign policy that secured peace, prosperity and low taxes, taking the wind out of Jacobite sails and restoring a financial confidence shattered by the South Sea Bubble scandal. Walpole tried to keep Townshend, then in Hanover with George I, on message: “I wish to God we may at least for a little time remain neutral and look on, if all the rest of Europe does the same thing.”
Instead, Townshend, more Hanoverian courtier than British statesman, schemed for aggressive war alliances with traditional enemies.
Fourth, he was too blunt for subterfuge. “If there be a place in the world where faction and intrigue are natural and in fashion, it is (the court of Hanover) which makes it no easy task for a stranger to behave himself inoffensively….” So not the best choice of diplomat for one of the trickier moments of European history.
Townshend-and-Walpole was the Britain-leading Norfolk dream team of 1722. But by 1727, to Townshend’s fury, this had become Walpole-and-Townshend and by 1729 was ending in a heated exchange about the way Walpole was managing the House of Commons.
Walpole thundered: “There is no man’s sincerity I doubt as much as your lordship’s!” whereupon Townshend very sincerely seized his burly brother-in-law by the collar and both men went for their swords. Only the intervention of friends prevented an affray. And that was the end of Townshend’s political career.
No, it was not politics that was to secure Townshend’s place in history, but a humble root crop. Turnips, (Brassica rapa subsp. rapa), helped make the Norfolk landowner an undisputed world-leader in his second career: the scientific revolution of agriculture, to which he devoted his spare time, and eight years of retirement until his death.
It was a revolution led by rich landowners, farming large estates in Norfolk, especially ones underwritten by political influence and incomes outside farming. Like Coke of Holkham, Townshend inherited a debt-free estate and could afford to risk experiments, his successes then emulated by progressive if not quite so wealthy yeomen farmers.
Position gave his experiments authority. Happily married to Walpole’s sister Dorothy and leading the family ‘firm’ of Townshend and Walpole as a recent Knight of the Garter, he began transforming Raynham Hall, lake, gardens and park at the height of his political power in 1724-5. His fashionable good taste, informed by long political sojourns in Holland, are reflected in the quiet elegance of the new entrance hall and grand saloon.
It was the age of growing literacy, ‘improvement’ culture and agricultural text books; of falling grain prices and a 13 per cent rise in the value of cattle; of greater incentives to improve pasture and find better winter feed. Scientific farming was incompatible with the medieval open field farming still being practised across half the country and even with the small-scale yeomen farming that had replaced it in some areas.
Enclosures were back in vogue, transforming communally cultivated open fields including the strips of Townshend’s smaller tenant units into large compact farms on which the new and more scientific mixed farming could thrive. Waste (and common) land was enclosed, hedged and made effective.
England went Dutch. Dutch meadow grasses - like clover and sainfoin - and fodder crops were imported; Dutch immigrants grew turnips and carrots in small enclosed English fields; Dutch textbooks were translated into English; Norfolk farmers sent their sons to Holland to learn the new methods. Traditional East Anglian ties with Holland (windmills, drainage) all helped this.
But what really put the ‘turnip’ in Townshend and transformed the farms was using the crop which still only made up 9pc of the cropped land by 1720 - as a break crop between two cereal plantings. Before he spotted its potential, turnips were something that only interested gardeners - something grown in pots or in gardens to top-up the family larder.
But when Townshend accompanied George I on a visit to his Hanoverian lands, he noticed how this ‘valuable root’ was being used to enrich the soil, a soil which reminded him of his own Norfolk estate.
So on his return to England, he urged his tenants to grow it in a similar way. As Nathaniel Kent later wrote: “The experiment succeeded, and by degrees, is gradually spread over this county, and in the course of time, to other parts of England, though their cultivation is by no means so general as it continues here.”
Kent’s 1796 account continued: “A good acre of turnips in Norfolk will produce between thirty and forty cart loads, as heavy as three horses can draw; and an acre will fat a Scotch bullock, from forty to fifty stone, or eight sheep.
“But the advantage of this crop does not end here, for it generally leaves the land so clean, and in such fine condition, that almost insures a good crop of barley and a kind plant of clover; and the clover is a most excellent preparative for wheat, so that in the subsequent advantages, the value of the turnip can hardly be estimated.”
Fed to livestock on the land, they caused it to be manured at the same time, doubly more productive than leaving it fallow. Along with clover and artificial grasses this rotation yielded nutritious pasture and a good hay crop. Stock could be improved in quality, increased in number and used to fertilise the soil simultaneously.
It was a win-win-win situation. The ‘Norfolk Four Course Rotation’ - cereal-turnips-cereal-grasses in a four-year cycle - was internationally celebrated. The Norfolk farmcart became the vanguard of the world, and money poured into estates to improve farmyards, farm buildings - and, of course, the big houses.
The Norfolk system, according to Arthur Young in 1771, combined turnips, rotation, rationalised buildings, enclosure, the use of marl or clay to improve soil, the creation of large farms and the granting of long leases by landlords to change the farmer into an improving landowner. And Townshend was doing it all decades before Young proclaimed it.
As early as 1704, Townshend was instructing his estate manager to oversee hedging, marling and selective breeding of the best stock cattle as well as sheep among his tenants and already engaged in ‘Enlightened’ farm-building.
By the time of his death Townshend’s reputation as an improving landowner with hedged fields “of a proper size for farms between 300 and 800 acres… square, well-disposed in relation to the home stall, the roads and the soil” - and his encouragement of turnip-growing - was proverbial throughout Europe. “He certainly practised the turnip culture on such an extent and with such success that he was copied by all his neighbours,” approved Young.
By 1787, Norfolk was being described as “the cradle of the Agricultural Revolution.” All this increased Townshend’s income by £900 per annum equivalent to a football transfer fee nowadays - and the total rental of the Raynham estate doubled between 1701 and 1756.
He transformed his Norfolk landscape from sheep-roamed heaths and commons into the hedged fields, compact farms and ‘classical’ architecture still recognisable today. Inspired by his Cambridge education, Grand Tour and a mind broadened by travel and government posts abroad, he rebuilt and re-landscaped the countryside.
Jonathan Swift could well be contrasting the relative value of Townshend’s two careers when he writes in Gulliver’s Travels: “Whoever can make two ears of corn or two blades of grass grow upon a spot of ground where only one grew before, would deserve better of mankind and do more essential service to his country than the whole race of politicians put together.”
What did the Townshends do for us? Bring Norfolk farms back to levels of prosperity not seen since the Middle Age wool boom, that’s what.
And it was all down to a Royal visit, a Norfolk politician... and a turnip.
For more see the English Model Farm (Windgatherer Press) and ‘Turnip’ Townshend: Statesman and Farmer (Poppyland Publishing) by Susanna Wade Martins. For Gareth’s EDP Weekend features and playscripts on Norfolk notables see www.garethcalway.co.uk/ blog.

The crop that built a county It’s hard to overstate the importance of turnips to Norfolk. If our medieval wealth was based on wool, then our 18th-century equivalent was heavily indebted to the crop and its associated innovations.
A 1796 report on Norfolk farming by Nathaniel Kent to the Board of Agriculture waxes lyrical about its impact. But it was not an easy crop. Kent wrote how it was ‘teasing and precarious crop, and admits of no certain rules to ensure absolute success’.
And Kent warned that he had recently met an Hanoverian nobleman, Count Hardenberg, who had told him that the crop of turnips had now declined in his home country, ‘which is a matter of surprise’. Kent urged Norfolk farmers to avoid similar problems by growing potatoes or vetch in their place every now and then.
The biggest enemies of turnips were the black canker caterpillar. Kent recommended filling the fields with ducks (which loved to eat them) or follow the Yorkshire farmers in employing women (at 5-8 shillings an acre) and children (at 3d or 4d each per acre) to pick them off the crops by hand.




October 12, 2014

The Siege of Lynn and Cromwell's Talking Head Autumn Tour 2014

CROMWELL'S COMING HOME!!

  Smile :) You are the 150+ person to read this post.

Hello Mum! Pic by Tony Rafferty
 
That headline was originally for the Huntingdon leg of the tour but it occurred to me that as I was en route to Wales down the A14 with all the stuff in the Astra tour bus, I could add a gig at the Maridon Theatre, Penygarn, for my mum. Which I did. At this, Mum was a high octane revelation in the audience participation lead role of triangle caller under her stage name of Fanny (it was my dad's choice of stage name) and three generations of Calways and their partners helped me bring the show alive in Wales. Cromwell's original family name of Williams and his little publicised Welsh antecedents - included in the Cromwell coat of arms - all came to the fore here. And so, on its 14th public performance, this autumn tour of 4 dates ended.

THE CROMWELL MUSEUM, HUNTINGDON!

'Cromwell's Talking Head' at the All Saints Church, Huntingdon the town of Cromwell's birth and education up to Cambridge. The 50 strong audience included members and executives of the Cromwell Society and the chair of the trustees of the Cromwell Museum : no pressure there then. Pic by John Goldsmith.

'Cromwell's Talking Head' (hear a  full radio production here) came home to  The Oliver Cromwell Museum, Huntingdon (performed in nearby All Saint's Church) on October 24. 7.30.  Elegantly sandwiched between two sets of veteran period musicians Spirit of the Ayre's ravishing  Cromwell-related airs, I sent the show out onto the hallowed air through a field of blinding theatrical light at the great and good of Huntingdon. (The cannonball provided gravitas passing from hand to audience hand.) A splinter of light from the vision Cromwell had of his future mission in 1630 perhaps? The vote of thanks was a work of art in itself.  The gentleman who introduced me lived in the house associated with the Huntingdon lecture responsible for its enduring legacy of witch hunting via the annual lecture against witches heard, but not believed, by Cromwell as referenced in Christopher Hill's classic study  'God's Englishman'. It felt good to be at the heart of Cromwell's England.

Shockingly, the only Cromwell Museum in existence * has had its funding withdrawn (effective from 2016) - this performance was a protest against that. Unless you think Charles III is likely to equal Cromwell's achievements in building Parliamentary democracy or national prestige (the greatest between Agincourt and Trafalgar) maybe think about funding this rather than some of the other relics that pass for our national heritage?

*Oliver Cromwell House in Ely, the show's HQ,  is not a museum as it contains no artefacts - with the invincible exception of the house itself and its unique historic site in the Cathedral city centre.


It was a night to remember at BINHAM LOCAL HISTORY GROUP, NORFOLK on Oct 23.

 Gareth showing the Binham audience the Siege of Lynn cannonball presented on the night by Veronica Lane
 
Hosted by Penny Alford who runs the BLHG - ably assisted by David Frost chair of the PDC and Geoff the excellent soundman/ Priory warden this is a lovely group of interested people. It's said you should never go back (I did a show called From The Bronze Age to the Ballad Age at Binham in July 2012) - well I have and in Binham it's even better the second time. At the start of the evening, I was also presented by a 350 year old cannonball from the Siege of Lynn to take on my tour with me by Veronica Lane, an item which belonged to her late husband Nic Lane who found it on his farm near Lynn, and that doesn't happen every gig. I regard myself as a steward - not a Stuart - of this highly appreciated - and appallingly heavy - weapon of mass destruction - and when I finally hang up my Cromwell tour or in 2043, the four hundredth anniversary of the siege (whichever is earlier) I will present it to Marriott's Warehouse Trust an an exhibit. (It flew over the very room inn which it would be placed.) Meanwhile, I will be displaying it around the country. It's going abroad - to Royalist Wales - very soon.     

  
Tom arrived in a sports car and shabby chic slippers to premiere our Binham ballads          

At Binham, the local angle was provided by Norwich composer/ guitar virtuoso Tom Conway who premiered our ballads about Binham Priory and the nearby Bronze Age barrow. (the site now graced with an archaeological information board abut the legend and the history.) I hope to post these splendid folk ballads online on sound cloud in due course. The lyrics are already here
See poster below for details.
 

Gareth voicing the two severed heads:
Cromwell's had an unusually large brain; Charles Stuart's just a royally big head
 
All Binham pictures by ace rock photographer Al Pulford. Al also helped with the best post-performance celebration (in the Chequers) since the last time the Familiars met Gaz and Maz in post-show celebration at Oliver Cromwell House in Ely on Apr 24 - six months to the (next) day.
 
Audience reviews of Binham - see comments at end of this post.

MARRIOTT WAREHOUSE TRUST'S FIRST SELL OUT SHOW!

 
A Lynn Double header
 
 
Out of this head: a dramatic monologue 'Cromwell's Talking Head'
- the horrible but true history of Old Noll's posthumously severed head
 

Dr Paul Richards - whose 'passion and common touch shines through everything he writes' (EDP) - described how besieged Lynn was a place of fishermen and merchants rather than holy warriors or politicals. The dissidents had mostly left Lynn for the New World in the 1630s, he explained.
 
And a splendid time was had by all under sunny September skies; rather different from the cannon fire of a September 3 in 1643. It was a very hot evening in that historic roof-space for the sell out crowd of 69, the biggest of the tour exceeding both Binham and Huntingdon by 19 heads, not counting the two on the pole, the biggest of all my Cromwell tour dates with the exception of the Ely Folk Festival. Dr Paul's erudite, scholarly chat focused on the people and the local economy and something else beyond - a sheer love of Lynn and its uniqueness as a port - and I've since pinched some key points to my touring lecture. It was very well received. Like him, I then stood in the 1643 firing line and voiced the conflict as Cromwell and Charles went into their severed double header.  If the chuckles and glowing reviews are anything to go by, this too was very well received. Read 2 reviews here.

The next engagement for Paul and I is A Hanse Christ Mess, our Christmas show on St Nicholas's Day Dec 6 in the Hamburg Suite at Hanse House. £5 and includes a mince pie and mulled wine. Book early!

The Cromwell tour poster with all the details

 
 
Original Press Release
 

Double Header: The Siege of Lynn by Dr Paul Richards and Cromwell’s Talking Head by Gareth Calway

Sep 3 Marriott’s Warehouse Upstairs, South Quay, King’s Lynn
September 3 was the date of the three decisive military victories of Cromwell’s life (1649, 1650 and 1651) and his own final victory over life (as he would see it)- his death in 1658.  And long before all this, in 1643, it was the day he arrived with a bang of cannon shot at the Siege of Lynn, a siege that arguably decided the course of the English Civil War. An eighteen pound cannonball interrupted divine service smashing through a window and clearing worshippers out of St Margaret’s Church on Sunday September 3.

Gareth Calway’s tour of Cromwell’s Talking Head has been successfully entertaining audiences at folk festivals (like Ely in 2013) and storytelling venues all over East Anglia since it began its bi-annual residency at Oliver Cromwell House in Ely in 2011. In it, Cromwell’s severed head tells the true but horrible history of the Great Roundhead’s afterlife – including his posthumous hanging and beheading for ‘treason’ at the Restoration in 1661 and eventual secret burial three centuries later in Cambridge University – and also of his radical life. The radio production was described as ‘a triumph of narration and verbal colouring.’ Last winter, Gareth added a separate talk about the Siege of Lynn for local audiences and for its King’s Lynn premiere this spot has been handed to Lynn’s very own historian, Dr Paul Richards.

Dr Richards has recently published ‘King’s Lynn In Pictures’ ‘Paul’s passion and common touch shines through everything he writes’ (Trevor Heaton) the only English-authored chapter in ‘Hanse und Stadt’ a German history of the Hanseatic League (Lynn was a key member) and author of the town’s only modern history survey ‘King’s Lynn’ a complete history, packed full of information, intriguing anecdote and informed analysis. For once the term ‘expert’ may be used modestly. Dr Richards is a town guide on luminaries from Margery Kempe to Walpole to Burney; on its historic buildings, waterfront and pubs and can hold an audience entranced on any period or aspect of the town’s colourful past. This chance to hear him describe the besieged port’s month at the front line of English history in September 1643 should not be missed.

The double event takes place at 7.30 pm on September 3 in Marriott’s Warehouse Upstairs, (squeaky floor recently corrected!) at a bargain basement price of £5. Refreshments including wine- for donations only – will be provided during the interval.
Tickets are available in advance at the Custom House. It may be advisable to book early! Calway’s Cromwell tour continues solo to Binham History Group (Oct 23) and The Oliver Cromwell Museum in Huntingdon (Oct 24)



.

October 11, 2014

Double reviews of our Cromwell/Siege of Lynn double header Sep 3 2014!!

Smile - you're the 250+ person to read this post...

"September 3rd. On the banks of West Lynn stood an army of vengeful Parliamentarians, led by Oliver Cromwell. Cannons fired over the Great Ouse…
 
Exactly 371 years later, a sell-out crowd gathered at Marriott’s Warehouse. The Siege of Lynn and the Civil War were revived by eminent historian Dr Paul Richards and the writer and raconteur Gareth Calway.
 
Dr Richards delivered a talk on the Siege, with various fascinating diversions. He set out a compelling case that Lynn’s politics were influenced more by mercantile interests than spiritual convictions.
 
Part 2, presented by Gareth Calway, starred Cromwell’s decapitated head. In this amusing monologue, fact was stranger, and more macabre, than fiction. We were treated to more puns than we could count (eyes rolled, not unlike the heads!). This consummate performance was a novel way to present the past.

The evening’s entertainment was fit for a King - or a Lord Protector!"  Helen Thirkettle

 



 
 
Need a second opinion?
 
Read this alternative review on the Lynn News website
here. Lots of other readers have!